Thursday, October 29, 2015

Gracious Dismissal Policy 2.0 – Moving Forward…Grieving Forward


“Live in harmony…be sympathetic, love…, be compassionate and humble.” 1 Peter 3:8-9
            As many of you have heard, in the last two weeks our stated clerk received letters from six Sessions requesting to enter into the discernment process toward dismissal: Christ Goodyear, Fountain Hills, First Scottsdale, Horizon, First Wickenburg and Community Lake Havasu (in the order in which we received the letters). These churches bring to nine the number of congregations that may be dismissed from the PCUSA either this year or next. The other three are Northminster, who is currently in dialogue with an Administrative Commission, and Springerville and Alpine, both of whose dismissal terms will be acted upon at our stated meeting in Pinetop, November 6-7.
Peacemakers who sow in peace raise a harvest of righteousness. James 3:18
            It is with sadness that the presbytery staff received these letters. Others may feel different emotions, but speaking personally I grieve that any of our brother and sister Presbyterians feel the need to seek fellowship in another Reformed denomination. Yet I also recognize that such actions are being taken by congregations throughout the country; this is neither new, nor particular to the Presbytery of Grand Canyon. That we have been thrust into such a time as this only heightens our responsibility to “get it right” in Pinetop, by which I mean prepare the way to perfect, if necessary, and then pass a dismissal policy that will guide us forward with grace as best as is possible given the difficulties inherent in the process.
“…Speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into…Christ.” Ephesians 4:15
            As the Presbytery Pastor I call for a week of prayer: that all would come to Pinetop with a spirit a humility; that all might find a tender spot in their heart for brothers and sisters with whom we may disagree; that all may allow their grief at our communal brokenness yet in such ways that our grief does not turn outward into anger; that we may begin in Pinetop to live into the values affirmed in the proposed policy:
·         Charitable
·         Viable
·         Responsible
·         Missional
·         Relational
 Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. 1 John 4:7
            Someone wondered why, two weeks ago, I interspersed Scripture amidst my missive in reflecting upon the Gracious Dismissal Policy that will come before presbytery. Let me make explicit what was for me implicit: the interspersing of Scripture verse is a reminder, first to myself and then to others, that in the midst of difficult relationships the Word calls us to pay special attention to the law of love. We are living in just such a time, none of us blameless, no not one, but all of us of us overshadowed by the mercy of Christ Jesus our Savior. May this truth bring us enough comfort and peace that we dare to walk as Jesus walked, with an uncommon integrity, an unflinching willingness to love friend and enemy alike, and an uncompromising desire to reconcile people to God and to one another.
“…first take the plank out of your own eye, and then
you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.” Matthew 7:5
Grace to you today and always,

Brad Munroe

Thursday, October 22, 2015

Secular Students Attend Seminaries to Learn the 'Language of Moral Discourse'

© 2015 The Wired Word
www.thewiredword.com

Within the last 10 years or so, there's been a trickle of secular students enrolling in Protestant divinity schools, enough so that last week, The New York Times published an article about the trend.
These non-traditional students include those labeled these days as "nones" -- those who, when asked on forms about their religious affiliation, check the "none" box. Some of these describe themselves as "spiritual but not religious" -- sometimes meaning that they have not rejected the idea of God but are not connected to any particular faith group -- while others are declared atheists. Yet each has enrolled because of some value they hope to find in an education rooted in religious tradition.
And reportedly, they are not coming away disappointed in what they find.
Unlike the majority of seminary students, the nones are not intending a life's work in the ministry or some other facet of church life. Some aspire to careers in social work, activism, community organizing or chaplaincy in an institution that includes humanists in such positions.
The New York Times article said two factors are driving this trend. One is the increasing number of nones in the United States -- as many as a third of those born between 1981 and 1996 -- and the other is that more so than any other form of higher education, divinity schools offer "a language of moral discourse and training in congregational leadership," which is transferable to other fields of work.
The article quoted Eboo Patel, the founder and president of Interfaith Youth Core, who has noticed the seculars while visiting campuses. Patel said, "No small part of them are attracted to the search for social justice and for spiritual meaning. And they recognize those things as the fruits of religious tradition. So it makes sense to go to a place where you can study religious tradition."
One of the nones, Vanessa Zoltan, who recently graduated from Harvard Divinity School, had previously attended graduate school at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania for nonprofit management, but she rejected the capitalist "theology" she learned there, which maintains that the market is a value system. In an ethics course at Wharton, however, she recognized that the people she most admired -- Gandhi, King, Emerson, Tolstoy and Alcott -- all had deep religious or spiritual lives. Zoltan eventually switched to Harvard Divinity School.
While Zoltan still does not believe in a deity, she found the concept of sacredness compelling, and now looks for ways to "consecrate the secular," the article said.
The article concludes by quoting Zoltan: "I got inspired. I'd spent a lot of my 20s being disappointed by grad school and the nonprofit world. And at Div School, people are excited. They get Alice-in-Wonderland lost in theology. It made me happy."
More on this story can be found at this link:


The Big Questions

1. How would you explain the difference between "spiritual" and "religious"? Can a person be only one of the two and still please God, and if so, which one of the two?
2. Is it possible to satisfy a spiritual hunger without believing in God? Explain your answer.
3. What makes something sacred? What might it mean to "consecrate the secular"?
4. How is the language of moral discourse different from other kinds of discourse?
5. In what ways might society benefit by having social workers, community organizers and activists receive a Christian ministry education even if those persons never embrace the way of Christ? Are there any ways in which society might suffer because such persons have that education?
Confronting the News With Scripture and Hope
Here are some Bible verses to guide your discussion:

John 6:35, 44
Jesus said to them, "I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty. … No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me ...." (For context, read 6:25-45.)

Jesus is talking here about spirituality. When he describes himself as "the bread of life" and says those who come to him will never be hungry, he's not talking about physical nourishment, but about satisfying another kind of hunger, something we yearn for in our spirit. Likewise, when Jesus says that no one can come to him "unless drawn by the Father," he's talking about an action of God within us, whether we respond to it or not. We might call that action by God a spiritual tug.
For purposes of clarity and discussion, let's define our spiritual side as the place where at least one of the following happens (these definitions from TWW team member Stan Purdum's sermon, "The Spiritual Gateway"):
First, it is the dwelling place of the conscience, the place where a person's moral code gets imbedded. It is normally present in everybody. We can repress the conscience. We can do something that violates our moral code and argue boldly that we are no longer bound by such antiquated ideas of right or wrong. But when someone else does the same wrong thing against us, we condemn them, showing that we still have some sense of the wrong of certain actions.
Second, our spiritual nature is the place where values reside and where we find meaning for our lives. Even if that which we value is not noble, the presence of any values that relate not primarily to our own well-being but to that of others means we are hearing from our spiritual nature. A hard-hearted gangster who can kill in cold blood but can also be sacrificial and loving toward his own children has some values, even if they are grossly distorted.
Third, our spiritual nature is the place from which the recognition of higher power and the capacity to worship arises. Naturally, the next step is to attach an identity to this higher power, but the admission of the supremacy of Something beyond ourselves is a first step. When Jesus says that no one comes to him unless the Father draws him or her, it reminds us that the inclination to worship something outside of ourselves is a God-given gift. God draws us to himself. We can resist that pull, but the place where we feel it is in our spiritual side.
Fourth, our spiritual nature is one place where faith begins. Faith does not refer to absolute certainty about the existence of God or even about one's salvation. It does, however, describe an attitude where our tendency to believe in a power greater than and outside of ourselves is stronger than our tendency to doubt that power's existence. Also, faith means trusting ourselves into the keeping of that higher power.
Even if we are aware of only one of these four things, we are hearing something from our spiritual nature.
Questions: How many of these four can you identify within yourself? To what degree has receiving Christ satisfied your inner hunger?
What potential, in your opinion, does partaking of the Bread of Life, whether in the form of God's Word, an encounter with the person of Jesus, or satisfying a hunger for spirituality, have for a full-blown faith? Or do you think this bread is wasted on those who come to it for the "wrong" reason?
Mark 12:34 
You are not far from the kingdom of God. (For context, read 12:28-34.)

The sentence above is the culmination of an episode where a scribe asked Jesus which commandment should be considered the "first" (the most important). Jesus answered that it was the one about loving God with all one's heart, soul, mind and strength, and he added that the second most important was the one about loving one's neighbor as one loved one's self.
The scribe then agreed with Jesus, saying that keeping those two commandments was "much more important than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices" (v. 33). At that, Jesus responded to him with the words above: "You are not far from the kingdom of God."
We note that Jesus did not say, "You are in the kingdom of God," but his comment does recognize that the scribe is headed in the right direction. The Message version of the Bible renders Jesus' comment as "You're almost there, right on the border of God's kingdom," and we can easily imagine that Jesus would have liked him to take the next step and enter the kingdom. Nonetheless, Jesus praised the man for the distance he'd come.
This scribe might represent some of the secular seminary students -- following an inner urge to find that which is greater than they are, but not quite in the kingdom of God, at least not yet.
Questions: What do you think Jesus would say about someone who does not believe in God but who works diligently at loving others? What do you think Jesus would say to that person?
Do we only come to faith through a swift come-to-Jesus moment or do we come to faith by stages? Does either reflect your experience?
Ephesians 4:29 
Let no evil talk come out of your mouths, but only what is useful for building up, as there is need, so that your words may give grace to those who hear. (For context, read 4:29--5:2.)

We understand "moral discourse" to be conversation where certain moral standards are assumed, where some options will not be considered because they violate those standards and where the standards are based on not one's personal opinion, but on something (or Someone) higher than one's self.
In the verse above, Paul is speaking of moral discourse when he commends talk that is useful for building up and giving grace.
Question: How do each of following verses assume moral discourse? 
     • Numbers 11:17 - "I will come down and talk with you there; and I will take some of the spirit that is on you and put it on them; and they shall bear the burden of the people along with you so that you will not bear it all by yourself."
     • Deuteronomy 6:4-7 - "Hear, O Israel: The LORD is our God, the LORD alone. You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might. Keep these words that I am commanding you today in your heart. Recite them to your children and talk about them when you are at home and when you are away, when you lie down and when you rise." 
     • 2 John 1:12 - "Although I have much to write to you, I would rather not use paper and ink; instead I hope to come to you and talk with you face to face, so that our joy may be complete."

For Further Discussion
1. Respond to this, from TWW team member Douglas Hargis: "The word 'spirituality' is a loaded word, subject to very different perspectives. In its most general sense, spirituality revolves around that which provides meaning to one's life. Some people's spirituality revolves around music; others' around football; still others' around religion. Idolatry is spirituality.
     "Therefore, I like to talk about Christian spirituality in order to distinguish it from all other forms of spirituality. That focus narrows even further to questions like, How does my life reflect the greatest commandment: loving God with all my heart, soul, mind and strength? How does my life reflect the second greatest commandment: love my neighbor as I love myself? What opportunities do I have this week to exhibit the first fruit of the Spirit: love? How can I be in a context where I am 'spurred on toward love and good deeds' (Hebrews 10:24)? How does my life exhibit Christian maturity, which is to reflect the likeness of Jesus himself, being a little Christ, the very definition of Christian?"

2. Is there anything about going to seminary as a "none" that is going to save that person's soul? Would the best outcome be for such individuals to find an authentic faith in Christ?
3. Respond to this, from TWW team member Mary Sells: "Technically I suppose I was a 'none' from 17 to 39. I was raised Catholic, got involved with evangelical Christians from 13-17, then could not resolve that God loved only a small handful of people and the rest were going to hell. I walked away a believer who did not understand this God and did not return to church until the tug of spirit was greater than my reservations about organized religion. It has taken me years, and will continue forever, to learn about the loving God.
     "I empathize with the nones, whose path I have experienced. It is true that faith is God's gift, so he may or may not have plans for those nones going for theology education. Jesus tells us that loving people are his, so -- in a sense -- perhaps goodhearted nones are better Christians than some of us who profess Jesus. I believe and experience that spiritual food grows faith, so maybe God is showing us this in unlikely people (such as me)."

Responding to the News
Look at the questions Douglas Hargis poses in his comments about Christian spirituality in the "For Further Discussion" section above and consider how to answer them personally.
Closing Prayer
O God, help us to be appreciative of all those who are not far from, but not quite in, the kingdom of God. Let us encourage their efforts to love their neighbors as they love themselves, to participate in moral discourse and to continue to respond to your urgings within them. In Jesus' name. Amen.

Friday, October 16, 2015

Presbytery Transformation Grant

The Leadership Team is seeking a Presbytery Transformation Grant (PTG) from the General Assembly. A PTG, if received, would fund initiatives aimed at creating congregational renewal within all our Presbytery of Grand Canyon churches. The intent would be to lead ministry training events designed for ruling elders, teaching elders and other congregational leaders.
A Leadership Team task force met to brainstorm some possibilities but we need help - specifically, we need the voice of the presbytery meeting in plenary in Pinetop. We need your ideas. We need your hope and dreams. We need you to point us in the right direction.
            For my Presbytery Pastor’s Report in Pinetop, I am going to ask us to discuss the following questions in small groups
1.      What information, skills development or leadership training would be most helpful regarding the ministry areas listed below?
  • Promoting Congregational Evangelism
  • How to Lead through Change
  • Moving toward Multi-Cultural Ministry
  • Initiating Congregational Renewal
  • Missional Ministry
  • Ministering to Millennials
2.      Specifically, what is:
  • Information you would like to hear discussed?
  • Skill development on which you would like to focus?
  • Leadership training you would like to have?
  • Questions about one or more of the topics?
3.      Rank the above themes in order of priority from #1 (most important) to #5 (least important) as topics the presbytery should pursue for speakers, retreats and leadership training.
_____ Promoting Congregational Evangelism
_____ How to Lead through Change
_____ Moving toward Multi-Cultural Ministry
_____ Initiating Congregational Renewal
_____ Missional Ministry
_____ Ministering to Millennials

 
4.      What are three goals you personally recommend the Leadership Team set for a Presbytery Transformation Grant / Project?

 
Grace to you today and always,
Brad Munroe
            

Friday, October 2, 2015

Reflections on Discipleship: Ron Anderson




Luke's version of the Great Commission is found in Acts: "You will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth" (1:8). The Greek word from which we translate "witness" is martueso, from which we get the English word "martyr." I often wonder how preaching would differ on this passage if our English Bibles read, "You will be my martyrs...to the ends of the earth." Certainly this version of the Great Commission points to its unique, cruciform shape; that is, the work of being a witness to Jesus is cross-shaped, cross-focused, cross-centered and cross-bearing work! This is the life of discipleship in which we are called to live and move and have our being.
            Ronald Anderson, in Losing Control: Becoming a Pastor/Leader with Influence, suggests twelve ministry principles to encourage growth in Christian discipleship (Anderson, 239 ff.). Anderson focuses many of his goals toward fairly traditional definitions of congregational ministry: a focus on nurturing discipleship, on forming our identity in Christ, and on developing spiritual giftedness within the context of community, for example. However, what energizes me about Anderson's list of discipleship forming ministry principles is the way he includes an outward oriented focus as well, thereby connecting to Luke's understanding of the Great Commission:
  • Simple Goals: "The church's goals should be simple: that each believer master the spiritual disciplines...and develop the spiritual gifts needed to reach out beyond him- or herself to further the Kingdom in accordance with the direction of the Spirit."
  • Unbounded by a Building: "The church is located wherever its people are found...not a set of activities located in a building, it is what goes on in the lives of the members of the congregation, all week long, wherever they find themselves."
  • Staff: "All members of the [church] should see themselves as ministers and in a role of ministering to others, both inside and outside the community."
  • Budget: "The majority of [a church's] giving should be directed outward, with much of this money ideally directed through ministries in which these believers themselves are actively involved."
  • Missional: "The community, individually and collectively, reaches out in love to others...Their sense of mission reflects a concern for all dimensions of human life, including physical, psychological and spiritual."
What strikes me about these ministry principles is that Anderson targets some sacred cows of congregational life. Of necessity a congregation who takes seriously Anderson's call to make staffing, budgetary and programmatic decisions in accordance with the above will embrace the work of being a witness to Jesus as cross-shaped, cross-focused, cross-centered and cross-bearing work!Such work may be difficult, today, to do in our congregations, but it is within each of our grasps, today, to set it before ourselves as the horizon toward which we will journey together. The journey of 1,000 steps begins with a single step. And lest we forget: sacred cows make gourmet burgers.

Grace to you today and always,
Brad Munroe